課程名稱 |
跨域溝通與表達 Critical Reading and Writing for Multidisciplinary Communication |
開課學期 |
108-2 |
授課對象 |
寫作教學中心 |
授課教師 |
柯凱彣 |
課號 |
Write7017 |
課程識別碼 |
Q01EM0380 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期四7,8,9(14:20~17:20) |
上課地點 |
共303 |
備註 |
本課程以英語授課。與葉芳萍合授 限碩士班以上 總人數上限:17人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082Write7017_ |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
This course will focus on three specific areas: critical reading, academic research writing, and writing for a multidisciplinary audience. This course will train students to analyze, create, and support arguments in their academic writing, while also communicating their research (in both writing and speaking) to a multidisciplinary audience.
Many students and researchers struggle to write and communicate their research to people outside of their field, however cross-disciplinary communication and collaboration is becoming ever more popular and productive in research as a whole. To prepare students for cross-disciplinary and multidisciplinary communication, emphasis will be placed on communicating research, through both writing and speaking, in a way to facilitate understanding and communication. This will involve conducting audience/reader analysis, using more active sentence constructions, incorporating syntactic and semantic clarity, utilizing progression and transitions strategies, as well as making overall language and jargon considerations.
In this course, students will learn to develop their critical reading skills in order to present and support research arguments in their writing. Critical reading will involve such things as being able to evaluate academic arguments for clarity and logic, while also identifying any shortcomings an argument might have.
This course will focus on academic writing, specifically article writing. The moves and steps most common in published articles will be examined, and students will incorporate these move and steps into their own academic writing for this class. In addition to this, writing style and mechanics, such as clarity, style, and flow, will also be incorporated into research writing. This course will be conducted in English. |
課程目標 |
The primary aim of this course is to develop students’ ability to use critical reading and common rhetorical functions in organizing and writing ideas for academic and cross-disciplinary research. Cross-disciplinary, or multidisciplinary, refers to communicating to people, through both reading and writing, outside of the writer’s/speaker’s field and discipline. The course focusses on specific rhetorical writing skills such as: definition, description, and argumentation. Major written assignments in this course will focus on incorporating these rhetorical strategies, as well as logical progression and clear and descriptive style, to communicate students’ research to a cross-disciplinary audience. The instructional means adopted in this course include lecture, discussion, and hands on practice.
By the end of the course, students will be able to:
1. Critically evaluate and analyze a variety of texts for academic purposes.
2. Identify features of academic writing and apply the knowledge of academic writing to organize ideas into a logical and coherent text.
3. Utilize writing and rhetorical strategies for coherence and concision
4. Compose an article Introduction which presents their research in a clear and cohesive manner to a multidisciplinary/cross-disciplinary audience
5. Evaluate writing for clarity
6. Formulate academic arguments that are well supported through writing
7. Develop proof-reading and self-editing skills
8. Present their research in both writing speaking, utilizing content design and rhetorical strategies, to increase the intelligibility of their research to a cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary audience. |
課程要求 |
HW Assignments = 10%
Research Article Introduction = 20%
Persuasive Writing Piece = 20%
Debates = 20%
Persuasive Presentation = 10%
Research Presentation = 10%
Participation = 10% |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
|
指定閱讀 |
待補 |
參考書目 |
- Morrow, D.R., Weston, A. (2015) A Workbook for Arguments, Second Edition: A Com-plete Course in Critical Thinking Second Edition. Indianapolis, IN. Hackett publishing Company.
- Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2017). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
HW Assignments |
10% |
|
2. |
Research Article Introduction |
20% |
|
3. |
Persuasive Writing Piece |
20% |
|
4. |
Debates |
20% |
|
5. |
Persuasive Presentation |
20% |
Persuasive Presentation+Research Presentation |
6. |
Participation |
10% |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
3/05 |
– Course Introduction
– What is Critical Reading?
– Introduction to Critical Reading: Conclusion and Premise |
第2週 |
3/12 |
– Critical Reading: Identifying Conclusion and Premise(s)
– Writing: Writing Basics
– Article Introduction: Moves and Steps
– Opacity in cross-disciplinary/multidisciplinary communication |
第3週 |
3/19 |
– Article Introduction: Moves and Steps – Continued
– Critical Reading: Types of arguments
– Debate Practice
– Writing: Cohesion and Progression Patterns
– Audience analysis |
第4週 |
3/26 |
– Article Introduction: Continued
– Critical Reading: Argument Mapping
– Debate Practice |
第5週 |
4/02 |
– Writing in a multidisciplinary setting
– Speaking in a multidisciplinary setting |
第6週 |
4/09 |
– Debate: Debrief and Analysis
– Critical Reading: Mapping an Article
– Article Introduction: Introduction Analysis, peer review |
第7週 |
4/16 |
– Writing: Mechanics, Grammar + Style
– Transitions: Sentence, Paragraph, Discourse Level
– Methods: Analysis and steps |
第8週 |
4/23 |
– Critical Reading: Ambiguity, Fallacies, Article Analysis
– Cross-Disciplinary competence
– Methods: Continued |
第9週 |
4/30 |
– Persuasive Arguments into Persuasive Writing
– Critical Thinking: Continued
– Article Analysis |
第10週 |
5/07 |
– Debate Debrief
– Data Commentary (Results/Discussion) |
第11週 |
5/14 |
– Critical Thinking: Developing and Supporting Arguments
– Cross-Disciplinary Competence
– Data Commentary: Continued |
第12週 |
5/21 |
– Persuasive Writing: Peer Review
– Critical Thinking: Developing and Supporting Arguments Continued |
第13週 |
5/28 |
– 6 Minute Thesis: Presenting your Research
– Abstracts: Structure and analysis |
第14週 |
6/04 |
– Presentation Debrief |
第15週 |
6/11 |
– 6-Minute Thesis workshop and Peer Review |
第16週 |
6/18 |
6-Minute Thesis Presentation Day |
|